... among and alongside all these bad attitudes which seem calculated to outrage the values that most educated people today affirm - values which can be roughly summed up in the term liberal democracy - there exist other attitudes and values whose absence from contemporary life we all feel and are probably the worse for. The values are described by obsolete words like honor, truthfulness, loyalty, manliness, pride, straightforwardness, courage, self-sacrifice, and heroism. That these virtues exist as active and credible possibilities in the world of Stalky & Co., and that they seem not to in ours - or, if they do, appear almost solely in corrupted forms - must give us pause. Such a fact may serve to remind us that the moral benefits, conveniences, and superiorities of modern domestic societies have not been acquired without cost. Part of this cost seems pretty clearly to have been paid by a diminution in the older masculine virtues ... In the moral life of history there are apparently no gains without losses. Few books urge us to confront this contradiction more barely and boldly than Stalky & Co. — a přesně totéž platí i pro další Kiplingovy věci, obzvlášť pro leckteré jeho básně.

Kipling's subsequent reputation has changed according to the political and social climate of the age[8][9] and the resulting contrasting views about him continued for much of the 20th century.[10][11] George Orwell saw Kipling as "a jingo imperialist", who was "morally insensitive and aesthetically disgusting".[12] Literary critic Douglas Kerr wrote: "[Kipling] is still an author who can inspire passionate disagreement and his place in literary and cultural history is far from settled. But as the age of the European empires recedes, he is recognised as an incomparable, if controversial, interpreter of how empire was experienced. That, and an increasing recognition of his extraordinary narrative gifts, make him a force to be reckoned with."

Zrovna ten Kipling třeba, než tohle napsal, on přišel o syna ve válce. Takových bylo hodně, ale v tomto případě je ukrutná ironie v tom, že toho kluka pro špatný zrak vůbec nechtěli vzít do armády — ale sám Kipling přes své známosti na ministerstvu války prosadil, aby jej přesto přijali...